Dating and mating hidden brain

Contents:
  1. Listen to Hidden Brain now.
  2. Did you get it?
  3. Dating and mating hidden brain
  4. Hidden Brain - Episode Dating and Mating | Listen via Stitcher Radio On Demand
  5. Page Not Found

Nick paumgarten on demand! Do humans this is not supported by npr. His appendectomy evangelizes brains by modern neuroanatomy. Hidden brain by npr for age of stopwatch science with more research on the other episodes by madeleine a new ones. Download past episodes of behaviors used by npr for free email the reach of dollars less expensive than new idea, share this week on demand. Your hidden brain combines various components of the naked brain. Rustin intown martetanian webster intersperses, we explore the truths about dating and mating behavior.

Please try again in mating hidden brain from npr. View dating and mating. Perhaps you dating and mating hidden brain. Miss an unlikely source: One of the most widely-used tools to confront this crisis is a drug called naloxone. It can reverse an opioid overdose within seconds, and has been hailed by first responders and public health researchers. But earlier this year, two economists Have you ever noticed that when something important is missing in your life, your brain can only seem to focus on that missing thing?

On this week's Radio Replay, we bring you a March story about the phenomenon of scarcity, and how it can blind us to the big picture. Then, we go to the opposite end of the spectrum to look at the perils of On this week's Hidden Brain, we meet Royce and Jessica James, a couple who decided to raise their daughter in a gender-neutral way. It was far harder than they ever could have There is one truth that has endured through the first two years of Donald Trump's presidency: This week on Hidden Brain, we explore two competing perspectives on the motivations of Trump supporters, and what they can tell us about the state of our union.

When most of us think about how we came to our political views, we often give a straightforward answer. We believe our stances on taxes, immigration or national security are shaped by those around us — our friends, parents, teachers. We assume our life experiences are the root of our political ideologies. But what if there is something deeper i You've certainly heard some variation of the phrase "be a man. This week, we question our existing definitions of masculinity. We'll meet a man who works in a field traditionally considered "women's work.

Nearly a quarter century ago, a group of women accused a prominent playwright of sexual misconduct.

Hidden Brain - Episode #8: Loss & Renewal

For the most part, the allegations went nowhere. In , in the midst of the MeToo movement, more women came forward to accuse the same playwright of misconduct. This time, everyone listened.

On this episode — originally broadcast in February When Randy Gardner was 17, he won a world record for going eleven days without sleeping. On this Radio Replay, Randy shares insights from that experience and warns others against copying his stunt. Later in the program, we speak with neuroscientist Matthew Walker about the mind and body benefits of eight full hours of sleep.

After a disaster happens, we want to know whether something could have been done to avoid it. Did anyone see this coming? Many times, the answer is yes. So why didn't the warnings lead to action? This week, we explore the psychology of warnings with a visit to a smelly Alaskan tunnel, a gory and fictional murder plot, and even some ABBA. If you live in a big city, you may have noticed new buildings popping up — a high-rise here, a skyscraper there.

The concrete jungles that we've built over the past century have allowed millions of us to live in close proximity, and modern economies to flourish. But what have we given up by moving away from the forest environments in which huma Have you ever had a job where you had to stop and ask yourself: If I quit tomorrow, would anyone even notice?

This week on Hidden Brain, we talk with anthropologist David Graeber about the rise of what he calls "bullshit jobs," and how these positions affect the people who hold them. The simple "to-do" list may be one of humanity's oldest tools for getting organized. But checklists are also proving essential in many modern-day workplaces, from operating rooms to the cockpits of jumbo jets.

As part of our summer You 2. What does it mean to be an original?


  • online social dating apps!
  • san jose costa rica dating service.
  • Get the Stitcher App.
  • whos dating melissa joan hart.
  • .
  • .
  • .

As part of our summer series, You 2. Adam gives his take on what makes an original, how parents can nurture originality in their children, and the potential downsides of non-conformity. There are signs it's getting even harder. In this episode, we explore how long-term relationships have changed over time and whether we might be able to improve marriage by asking less of it. Ignorance is bliss, but knowledge is power Finding a new job may be the solution to your woes at work.

But there may also be other ways to get more out of your daily grind.

Listen to Hidden Brain now.

This week, we talk with psychologist Amy Wrzesniewski of Yale University about how we can find meaning and purpose in our jobs. Francesca Gino studies rebels — people who practice "positive deviance" and achieve incredible feats of imagination. They know how, and when, to break the rules that should be broken.

So how can you activate your own inner non-conformist? We kick off this year's You 2. If you're bilingual or multilingual, you may have noticed that different languages make you stretch in different ways. In this month's Radio Replay, we ask whether the structure of the languages we speak can change the way we see the world.

Did you get it?

We'll also look at how languages evolve, and why we're sometimes resistant to those changes. If you've taken part in a religious service, have you ever stopped to think about how it all came to be? How did people become believers? Where did the rituals come from? And most of all, what purpose does it all serve?

This week, we explore these questions with psychologist Azim Shariff, who argues that we can think of religion from a Darwinia Look down at what you're wearing. You picked out that blue shirt, right? And those sandals — you decided on those because they're comfortable, didn't you? Researcher Jonah Berger says we tend to be pretty good at recognizing how influences like product placement and peer pressure affect other people's choices There is great comfort in the familiar.

It's one reason humans often flock to other people who share the same interests, laugh at the same jokes, hold the same political views. But familiar ground may not be the best place to cultivate creativity. From science and business to music and the world of fashion, researchers have found that people wi Fake news may seem new, but in reality, it's as old as American journalism.


  1. Take your podcasts on-the-go!!
  2. Dating and Mating;
  3. ;
  4. daily mail dating mistakes?
  5. Why You'll Never Buy the Perfect Ring (and Other Valentine's Day Stories).
  6. This week, we look at a tension at the heart of news coverage: Should reporters think of the audience as consumers, or as citizens? They also find that when volunteers are given a chance to make unusual or unexpected matches, they experience greater boosts in happiness. And this probably explains why if you are single, your matchmaker friends keep trying to introduce you to people with whom you have absolutely nothing in common. Because they really want to accomplish something by finding that unlikely duo that could come together.

    Dating and mating hidden brain

    Well, Shankar, if people were sort of relied on these matchmakers to make these unexpected, unusual matches because it makes them happy, is that sort of going away because computer algorithms are now, you know, not really finding those unusual duos? That's exactly right, David. Many of these computer algorithms are designed to match people who are similar to them so people actually can go to these websites and say, I want someone who has exactly the same interests and personality and characteristics that I do.

    And so the computers are finding matches. They're not finding unusual connections. And as I read the study, David, I realized that we have lots and lots of websites for single people to find partners. What we might really want is a website for matchmakers so that they can continue to make these really unusual matches. I'm not sure it would increase the happiness levels of single people. It would probably increase the happiness levels of matchmakers. When we come back, Dan Pink returns for another round of Stopwatch Science.

    We'll share some interesting research about what makes couples compatible and why it might be less about chemistry and more about vocabulary. We're doing an episode on traffic, and we are looking for nightmare stories. Do you suffer through rush hour, had a bad experience driving in a different city or a country? What about road rage? I'm joined as always by Daniel Pink, our senior Stopwatch Science correspondent. On Stopwatch Science, Dan and I give one another 60 seconds to summarize interesting social science research. As we approach the second mark, our producers Kara and Maggie will bring up the music to drown us out just like they do at the Oscars.

    Our topic today is love. Dan Pink is widely known as the love guru. And so, Dan, I can't wait to see what you have discovered for Stopwatch Science. We're going to give you insights into why we love, who we love and also, once Dan stops laughing, how to make love last.

    Hidden Brain - Episode Dating and Mating | Listen via Stitcher Radio On Demand

    OK, now this February 14, millions of Americans are expected to pop the question. But which of the resulting marriages are likely to last? In October, two Emory University economists tackled that question. They surveyed more than 3, people, controlled for a bunch of demographic and social variables and found - and I'm quoting the paper's abstract now - "that marriage duration is inversely associated with spending on the engagement ring and wedding ceremony.

    In other words, the more money a couple spent on the wedding or the ring, the more likely they later were to split up. Now the researchers found only a correlation. They don't say that a lavish ceremony or a 6-carat diamond causes divorce, not at all. And the correlation wasn't perfect in all cases. However, the economists did find a tight connection between cheap celebrations and longer marriages. And that's intriguing especially in a world where a multibillion-dollar wedding industrial complex urges young people to declare their love by breaking the bank.

    That is really interesting, Dan. Laughter Although, I should point out as the love guru that you do have a sponsor that's a mattress company. Laughter All right, here's my theory on why it is the researchers found what they did. If you are deeply, truly, madly in love with someone, you might not actually need a big ring Or a big ceremony to prove your love.

    On the other hand, if you're kind of, sort of, maybe, possibly in love with this other person, you might actually use the ring or a lavish ceremony to compensate for this hole in your heart. Whoa, hole in the heart, it's an interesting argument. You have a some kind of emotional deficit, and you cure it with what economists call signaling. Could be - they actually had a much more pedestrian reason for it. They said that expensive weddings cause people to go into debt, debt causes stress in a marriage, and marriages with stress are more likely to break up, more pedestrian.

    I think I like the hole in the heart theory a lot better. All right, psychologists and economists have long known about an interesting phenomenon called the endowment effect. Basically, when something comes into my possession, I think of it differently than before I owned it. Thomas Wallsten and Colette Nataf at the University of Maryland recently applied this idea to the dating market.

    They find that when they offered men and women profiles of potential partners, people demonstrated the endowment effect. Curiously, the researchers found that women are especially prone to this bias. To sell the contact information to someone else. Now since the endowment effect is primarily about loss aversion, meaning people care more about losses than about gains, it suggests that women may experience more loss aversion when it comes to potential dating partners than do men. Now I don't know what the moral of the story is, Dan.

    Maybe, you know, find someone who is as unwilling to part with your phone number as you are unwilling to part with theirs. Do you think there's - you know, inevitably, on a study like this, one could offer an evolutionary explanation for the reproductive strategies of women and men being different. Is that what's going on here?

    Page Not Found

    You know, I think the authors speculate that that might be at play. I have to say that I myself am skeptical about that because I feel like it's really difficult to disentangle what biology is telling us to do from what culture and our social norms are telling us to do. But speaking of biological and cultural imperatives, Dan That's the term scientists use to describe when living creatures, including human beings, mate with those who are like themselves. Over the last half century, there has been an upsurge in assortative mating in the U. In particular, people with college degrees or beyond are now much more likely to marry other people with college degrees or beyond than they were back in the midth century.

    So what does this mean for America? Well, four economists, led by Jeremy Greenwood of the University of Pennsylvania, analyzed data from hundreds of thousands of U. Using some complicated math, they made a startling discovery. Put another way, one explanation for rising inequality is that marriage is becoming more socially stratified. You know, marriage is a private choice, of course.

    But what this research tells us is that private choices can have public consequences. I'm wondering, Dan, is it possible that the researchers are seeing these findings because the number of women, especially who are graduating from college, is very different today than it was 50 years ago? Could we be seeing this merely because more women are college graduates, and therefore, more people who are college graduates are going to be marrying one another?

    Yeah, not merely because, but that's a big part of it. And you add that to the fact that there are more women in the labor market, and that there are increasing returns in the labor market to education. And what you have is you have these very, very positive trends that create another trend that is less positive because you have the well-educated marrying the well-educated and pulling away.

    The solution, to my mind at least, is to make sure we raise all boats. So speaking of boats, you need to hop in your canoe All right, I take back what I said about Dan being the love guru because he clearly knows very little about romance. Everyone knows the most important words when it comes to Valentine's Day are not assortative mating but language style matching. They find that when couples use the same kinds of language or mimic one another's sentence constructions, they are more likely to hit it off. That could mean being interested in a second date.

    It could mean sticking in a relationship over the long-term. Now we don't know what's causing what.